We live in an age of forgetting.
Avatar: Movie Comments
Here’s the non-spoiler part. I’ll put the (kind of) spoilers under the fold, and add some extra space for those using an RSS reader.
1. If you see Avatar, you have to see it in a movie theater, the best one in your area. (I saw it in an IMAX-3D theater.)
2. I’d strongly consider seeing Avatar.
I don’t want to hype the movie too much. It have several flaws, arguably sizable flaws. But it’s the most immersive movie I’ve seen in a long time, one with a lot of “wow” moments. Also, I understand now why James Cameron had to wait for special effects technology to advance to this point before he could make the movie. More on that under the fold.
*
*
*
*
When I was in college in the mid 1990s, Netscape Navigator was the browser of choice and many web pages had gray backgrounds and “Under Construction” signs. But you could sense something exciting was happening, even if you couldn’t see the direction it would take.
In 1999, Avatar’s distant cousin The Matrix came out. One of the reason The Matrix is a great movie is because it captured both the excitement and wariness I think people had subconsciously about the new virtual world unfolding before their eyes. The Matrix is about us first becoming aware that we live in dual worlds, then exerting some control over the new virtual world, and finally the promise of mastery. (Totally sorry if I just spoiled The Matrix for you.)
If The Matrix keeps the virtual world at an uneasy distance, Avatar fully embraces it. In The Matrix, you enter the virtual world by jamming a plug in the back of your head. The transition is harsh and distinct. In Avatar, you lay in an enclosed bed and close your eyes.
In The Matrix, you mostly look the same in both worlds. One’s identity is enhanced but not fundamentally challenged. It’s always clear where the real you is, on the ship. In Avatar, the Na’vi the main character is connected to has a real physical presence. And the more time he spends as a Na’vi, the more he becomes one mentally, challenging the main character’s identity by the end in the most fundamental way (I don’t want to spoil it in case you haven’t seen it yet).
In fact, it is this blurring of the real and virtual worlds to the point of merger that Avatar is really about, and it’s why James Cameron couldn’t make this movie ten years ago. One, the technology didn’t exist at the time to blur the worlds convincingly. One example: I kept marveling at the facial expressions in this movie. It’s the first time I’ve seen them truly captured, and not cleverly approximated. The technique they used is going to make every CG facial expression created before it look fake. It’s that good.
The flying beasts soaring by the “real” mountains look equally natural. The aircraft are modern but not so futuristic to look different from the world we know. The merger of real and virtual is seamless, and that’s the point. The technology used to make the movie is essential to understanding the movie’s theme. That’s why it’s important to see it in a theater and on the best screen possible. To get this movie you have to become immersed in it, and it’s very hard to recreate that experience at home, no matter how nice your movie-viewing setup.
The second reason this movie couldn’t exist ten years ago is societal. The idea of a digital self was new then. What made The Matrix the perfect movie for that time, a movie introducing us to the notion of a virtual self, would have made Avatar too much of a stretch. No one was playing World of Warcraft characters for 40 hours a week, the Sims didn’t exist, and no one was making Mii avatars on their Wiis. It’s not that we are anywhere close to becoming 12-foot Na’vi, but stepping stones in the past several years (Facebook accounts, login names, online profiles, etc.) have developed our digital selves to the point where our minds are now open to the idea that today’s primitive avatars could become something much more different and real.
So while some of the dialogue is horrible, and the movie’s big climatic battle isn’t as interesting as what came before it, in some ways that’s besides the point. Like The Matrix, the point of Avatar is to show us a world that may be far away, but one that we are ready to take a peek at today.




about 2 months ago
Another sticking point with the movie is the lazy writing, with the Na’vi appearing to be a mash-up of native american / african stereotypes; and the racism, in which the only way this race of beings could be saved was by one of the invaders turning to their side and taking control. Because clearly, on their own, they would have continued to do nothing but shoot bows and arrows at armored vehicles.
There were plenty of cool things in the movie as well, but these enormous stumbles really killed it for me. Put another way, the movie was tactically brilliant but strategically flawed.
about 2 months ago
Lazy writing is a good way to put it. Some of what he wrote had a “first draft” quality to it. I think Cameron has the same problem as Lucas–he’s so powerful that he doesn’t have anyone telling him “”This sucks” or ‘This could be better”. (Seriously, they don’t have motorized wheelchairs in the future?)
The issues you mention are valid and would almost always lower my opinion of a movie, but this is one of the few cases where the special effects are so integral to the movie and groundbreaking that they dwarf the importance of everything else (for me).
If you look at the movie through the lens of “Native American parable”, then it’s hugely flawed. If you look at it through the lens of “commentary on virtual worlds” then it’s amazing.
about 2 months ago
Yes, but. The writing didn’t have to be lazy and racist.
The effects are amazing, beyond (any) other movie. But I expect that from big budget films now. Effects just aren’t that important to me.
It seems to me that movies today are about immersion and reality – often at the expense of a story. They’ve forgotten that movies were originally about telling a story. (This is an articulation that I’ve come to recently… need to spend more time with it.)
about 2 months ago
Jason, btw, Avatar 3D in 4D: don’t believe the hype. The fourth dimension didn’t add as much as I had hoped,
about 1 month ago
i watch AVATAR movie,its showing American mind set, to Kill innocent Women,Child and Older people, and Un-Armed Human any where in Planet and may be become in universe too, ll ready do in vietnam, cambodia, africa, Iraq and Afghanistan, and do propaganda they are Human been and others are terrorist, if One American Die in combat they kill thousand with modern ammunition and say “Save the World”
I can just pray the God, give him mind and hart to to respect other country human been, people get Food and Medicine Not Ammunition,
about 1 month ago
Avatar is like Sarah Paylen: “All fiction and no substance”.